Sinister

First and foremost, there is a question every horror film must answer: “Is it scary?” With regards to Sinister, the reply is an unqualified yes. Sinister scared the living daylights out of me. Through a combination of mood, music and fundamentals of the genre, director Scott Derrickson has created an accomplished work inspired by Japanese horror. Our protagonist, author Ellison Oswalt, writes about true life crime. He has recently moved his wife and kids into a new home so he can investigate an unsolved murder for his new book. Not only has Ellison kept the case a secret from his family, but they remain ignorant of the fact that he has moved them into the very home where the killing took place. Soon after, Ellison discovers a box labeled “Home Movies” in the attic. Their vicious content is the subject of this tale.
The picture employs 3 plot devices that would each be scary enough on their own. When combined, they make for an unbearably creepy narrative. The finding and subsequent viewing of these home movies, exploits a feeling of dread that proves to be most unsettling. A video record of the deaths of various families, they remain a most disturbing document of something evil. Second, children in peril is a malevolent contrivance that really adds to the rising tension. Third and finally, the summoning of a pagan god is rather frightful. Bagghul is a particularly nasty deity that we are given a history lesson on. This gives actor Vincent D’Onofrio the slightly random cameo of being the cult expert that Ethan Hawke must contact in order to make sense of what he’s experiencing.
Sinister is not a perfect film. I’ll admit, the father’s insistence on placing his family in peril and keeping them there is a far fetched basis necessary to accept in order for the story to even occur. However, the script addresses this. His last few books were unsuccessful and his family, once used to better financial times, have struggled recently. His ambition to write a bestseller upon solving the homicide of the previous occupants, consumes him. Ethan Hawke effectively portrays a man torn between protecting his family and a fervent desire to solve the mystery and achieve financial success. His motivations are much more convincing than say John Cassavetes in Rosemary’s Baby or Jack Nicholson in The Shining. Granted, there is a particularly unsavory element in uncovering a cache of what basically amounts to a collection of snuff films. Though the idea itself is pernicious, the presentation is thankfully restrained.
Sinister is rather chilling. As it details a man’s obsession to find out the truth, the narrative unfolds in a very believable fashion. Even when we the audience must take a leap of faith to stomach what this father/husband has indirectly brought upon his family, we can understand, though not condone, his motivations. By employing traditional cinematography along with the found footage of the super 8 movies he discovers, director Scott Derrickson fashions drama around a most unpleasant spirit. The grainy reels that Ellison watches late at night is eerie. The jump cutting, haphazard images combine with a truly creepy soundtrack by Christopher Young and a pastiche of dark original music by ambient music artists like Accurst and Boards of Canada. A shadowy figure, with a white triangular face and black eyes is seen in the bushes in one shot. The simple image is frightening. The whole production makes something like The Woman in Black (released last February) look like a ride on a children’s merry-go-round. Sinister is without question the scariest movie of 2012.
October 23, 2012 at 7:15 am
Excellent review, my friend! Suffice it to say, without giving away too much of my upcoming review, Sinister is the better choice over PA4.
October 23, 2012 at 7:22 am
I trust you on this. I really wasn’t a fan of PA3 and I’m sure I won’t enjoy another one of those films.
t’s funny. I was going to send my “Sinister” review to you directly on Twitter, but before I could, you had already retweeted it. That is amazing. Thank you!
October 23, 2012 at 7:53 am
Good review Mark. It’s a pretty freaky movie that’s more about the mood and atmosphere it creates, rather than just throwing buckets of blood and gore at the screen for a scary-effect. It’s a surprise that Scott Derrickson did this considering the guy hasn’t had the best track-record as of late.
October 23, 2012 at 8:07 am
You’re right. I was surprised. Derrickson’s last, The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008), was wretched and The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) was pretty lackluster.
October 23, 2012 at 11:24 am
“The grainy reels that Ellison watches late at night is eerie.”
It’s nice to read your take on it. I think you touched upon the scariest part–rather, parts–of the movie in which Hawke’s character just… watches these sick “home movies” at night for research. Every time the images were projected onto the screen, I expected something reach for him. Couple that with his investigations of random noises at night (funny how no one ever wakes up until after the fact), I cowered in my shoes.
But what did you think about that ending (last 10 minutes)? I’m sure you know this but I hated it!!! It was an otherwise great experience.
October 23, 2012 at 3:23 pm
I didn’t really have a problem with it. Given the premise and what we learn through the course of the film, the ending conformed to the initial setup. It wasn’t particularly innovative, true, but it satisfactorily ended the film. For a truly bad ending, see Silent House.
October 26, 2012 at 8:56 am
Which version? I hated the original… (La casa muda)
(My review isn’t posted yet, though.)
I sorta liked the remake. lol
October 28, 2012 at 9:20 am
Oh I was talking about the remake. I had heard the original was better actually. I won’t be watching it though.
October 23, 2012 at 12:26 pm
Okay, Mark. You’ve convinced me. I think it’s a must to check this one out now. Nice review!
October 23, 2012 at 3:24 pm
Thanks. If you enjoy horror films like Insidious, then I’d check it out.
October 23, 2012 at 5:04 pm
I haven’t seen that one yet, either.
October 31, 2012 at 8:25 pm
Okay, I finally saw this. It scared the living hell out of me. I so agree on Ellison’s determination to tough out living in that house, despite all the crazy ominous stuff happening. I’ll certainly have to discuss that in my own review lol. Want me to send you a tweet once I’ve posted it? (In case you don’t see it in your reader, haha).
November 1, 2012 at 1:29 am
Sure, go right ahead. Glad you enjoyed it or that it scared you. (evil laugh)
November 1, 2012 at 6:00 am
Well it scared me enough to make me loathe the sun going down hahah, but to me that’s a good thing.
October 23, 2012 at 1:48 pm
I had hope that you were going to review this at some point. There seems to be a variety of glowing as well as scathing reviews for “Sinister”, so I guess it’s something like “Insidious” in 2012. I’m getting more and more excited about this one. Let’s hope I can go on Election Day and don’t have to wait for DVD.
P.S.: Is this the same Ethan Hawke who was in “Dead Poets Society” and 2000′s “Hamlet”? I’m having trouble imagining him in a horror movie.
October 23, 2012 at 3:31 pm
He’s been acting in films for almost three decades. It’s about time he did a horror film. Don’t cha think?
Insidious is a classier horror film, but Sinister is very well done nonetheless.
October 26, 2012 at 8:58 am
^ A big YES to the last sentence. I cannot believe they’re making a sequel. Gulp!
October 25, 2012 at 2:36 am
Good review there Mark. You’ve sold me on this one. I’ll be bumping this up on my list now.
October 25, 2012 at 9:50 am
Reception has been mixed, but I thought it was very creepy.
October 25, 2012 at 10:32 pm
Great review, Mark. I’ll check this one out after reading your post. It’s in theaters over here as well.
October 28, 2012 at 9:19 am
Let me know what you think Fernando.
October 26, 2012 at 6:11 pm
Great review. very creepy story . on a side note, do you think that Ethan Hawke is an underrated actor? i thought he was great in Gattaca and pretty good inTraining Day.
October 28, 2012 at 9:19 am
I think he’s a pretty good actor that gets the respect he deserves.
October 26, 2012 at 8:07 pm
This was one of the most disturbing horror films I’ve seen in a long time.
October 28, 2012 at 9:17 am
Yeah I thought so too.
October 29, 2012 at 9:47 am
Great review, Mark. I’ve never been a fan of the horror genre, but this really intrigues me. Insidious was more creepy than scary but I enjoyed it in the main. Many horror film trailers put me off for purely being extremely predictable in themselves – perhaps this is the exception.
October 29, 2012 at 9:43 pm
I’d have to admit that most horror films are somewhat predictable. There’s a routine to how people get scared. Sinister is no exception. But it still is very very creepy.
October 29, 2012 at 3:19 pm
Such a great review Mark as usual
I haven’t seen it yet but I’ve heard nothing but praise for this film. A lot of people are comparing it with Insidious, another film with good reviews overall.
October 29, 2012 at 9:44 pm
Insidious was better but this does the job. If you’re looking for some pre-Halloween scares, check it out.
October 29, 2012 at 5:03 pm
This movie scared me quite a bit. I was right there with Ethan Hawk for the whole ride. I agree, it had some flaws, but I didn’t care. I love being terrified by a non-gory movie.
October 29, 2012 at 9:45 pm
I didn’t care about the flaws either. I got scared while watching it.